Loop:Regarding Your Post To Corp
You might be right about all the statements you make.
But with all due respect, how do you know what he knows? Isn't that objectionable because it calls for speculation about the state of mind of another?
And, respectfully, a few of your statements involve legal conclusions; legal conclusions that are far from obvious--in some cases the Courts disagreed with you. That doesn't make the Court "right," but it does mean that what they said is the law of the case. The law is what the courts say it is. You characterize the Judge's decision as an "end run..." etc. Well do you think she'd agree with that? (hopefully you don't appear in front of her and have that come back to haunt you someday).
When you say things are "clear" well saying so doesn't make it so and saying something is "clear" doesn't tend to be persuasive argument in my experience.
I understand that you were/are a lawyer. Just out of curiousity, what area of law did you practice in? (not geographically, but substantively). Was it intellectual property? Contracts? Commercial litigation?
So that you don't have to break your promise, if you choose to answer, you can respond to the last part only, unless you want to answer more. And of course, you're under no obligation to answer at all as I'm sure you know.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
