kozuh, i'm saying YOU are just one science denier in this case. Just one of those who deny the best (right or wrong) science we have on global warming. You know the global warming science we have is supported by some 89% of scientists, no, psychologists i don't think are included in those, if they are it wouldn't matter as that best science we have, (arrived at via the scientific method) is supported by some 99% of climatologists. You are a global warming science denier who, as the others, come up with every rationalization to justify your rejection of the best science we have on it.
Yes you recently posted one on the scientific method, this is a better one .. excerpt ..
"A scientific fact is objective, right or wrong it is objective. The scientific method, you know ..
it sure feels a waste of time giving you more on this, anyway this last in case you haven't taken time for much of it .. one of F6's with name change to fit you here ..
NOW please .. 1. click the link inside the one above .. 2. then go to the 2nd link in the link list at the bottom of, "Rapture Ready: The Science of Self Delusion", and click it .. 3. then go left to the one that one is in reply to .. to see one you probably haven't seen, and one which also is a door to one F6 climate, global warming library .. 4. spend some time on all those ..
Enough of giving you any more now .. for sure .. warm to them .. right or wrong, it's the best science we have and supported by some 99% of climatologists .. the computer models, part of the Predictionsin bold above, are the best available today.
Plenty enough for you to stew about in IF you are interested in gaining a bit more info and objectivity on it all.
Jonathan Swift said, "May you live all the days of your life!"