Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,368.85
(
-1.67%
)
US TECH 100
22,405.20
(
-2.38%
)
Dow Jones
45,166.64
(
-1.73%
)
Brent Oil
106.89
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
66,389.10
(
0.10%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 575719
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

kozuh

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 65
Posts 9634
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/31/2004

kozuh

Re: fuagf post# 141551

Tuesday, 05/31/2011 8:32:43 AM

Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:32:43 AM

Post# of 575719
I am NOT saying you are WRONG ...

about ... GLOBAL WARMING ... but I am
saying the burden is on YOUR SIDE to
use the Scientific Method to prove your
Hypothesis.

Meteorology and CLIMATOLOGY are
empirical sciences which means the
Hypothesis must be verified by REALITY,
not by computer models and theories
and anecdotal stories.

A computer model written by biased scientists
that says the Climate will be much warmer
in 2030 or 2050 is NOT SCIENCE ... . It is
a Hypothesis at best. How can we test such
output until the date is 2030 or 2050 ??????

Because Koz is "America's Rude Awakening," the comments of Koz contain adult language and psychological nudity; reader discretion is advised.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today