Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,503.74
(
-0.20%
)
US TECH 100
29,038.80
(
-0.59%
)
Dow Jones
50,666.66
(
0.41%
)
Brent Oil
93.22
(
-3.88%
)
Bitcoin
75,207.14
(
-0.84%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257644
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

DewDiligence

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 843
Posts 123024
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 09/05/2002

DewDiligence

Member Level

Re: investorgold2002 post# 120755

Monday, 05/30/2011 2:26:24 PM

Monday, May 30, 2011 2:26:24 PM

Post# of 257644

There is no case for Obviousness as far as I am concerned.

I don’t agree. The argument for invalidity due to obviousness/double patenting is likely going to be stronger against some of the other patents at issue in the litigation than against this one, specifically.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today