News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 5
Posts 973
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2011

Re: DewDiligence post# 120747

Monday, 05/30/2011 2:22:32 PM

Monday, May 30, 2011 2:22:32 PM

Post# of 257253
"Whether Teva/Yeda’s “discovery” of lower toxicity from a narrower range of molecular weights is or isn’t obvious may become moot in the context of the overall patent litigation if NVS/MNTA establish that their production process does not depend on a predetermined range of molecular weights"

That still is NOT case for obviousness. There is no case for Obviousness as far as I am concerned. There is a case for non-infringement which you explained. There is case for inequitable conduct. There is prolly a case for indefiniteness.


"it is not necessary for NVS/MNTA to prevail on all four arguments against each patent; rather, it is merely necessary to prevail on one of the four arguments against each patent. "

I never disagreed on that.

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now