MNTA/TEVA—I was asked on another board whether the Court ruling in #msg-63573604 changes the odds in the Copaxone patent case. The answer, IMO, is: yes, but not by enough to worry about.
As can be seen in the table in #msg-59688565 (from Feb 2011), I figured there was only a 5% probability that NVS/MNTA would prevail on the inequitable conduct argument, specifically. This probability should now be somewhat lower, but the decrease amounts to round-off error, IMO.
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.