News Focus
News Focus
Followers 23
Posts 4070
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/03/2007

Re: Jeremiah post# 95278

Thursday, 05/19/2011 9:21:45 AM

Thursday, May 19, 2011 9:21:45 AM

Post# of 103341
Jerry...could you please clarify the following post with the entire body of information you were given about Expo's filing "error"? It is being used, IMHO, to manipulate the facts:

I was asked to call Nevada's SOS and speak with a person as to whether or not the heading error in the last known entity action (2.01.2011) could be corrected using that form I put up. The answer I received was a no. That once any filing is official the heading cannot be corrected on that particular filing.

Fine, I will accept their procedural technical answer at face value.

Fact vetting the ~ no way to correct ~ heading error is ongoing.


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=63299290

This is being "interpreted" (and utilized against the truth of the matter) as you stating the NV SOS guy told you the Expo R/S filing was completely impossible to be amended for intent with a superceding form. The truth as I am certain you understand it, is that NO.....the original filing ITSELF cannot be physically changed or altered in any way using that form or any other procedure. Which is a good thing for obvious purposes as it leaves a clear paper trail of what if going on for the shareholders. BUT the original filing can be AMENDED FOR INTENT and CORRECTED by filing a SEPERATE and distinct filing form you yourself received from the NV SOS and posted. Then there would be TWO forms covering that one material event...the original containing the error (which you correctly point out CANNOT be changed or altered) and the AMENDED superceding form, correcting it. This has caused some confusion and is being used to manipulate the clear instructions given by the NV SOS. All IMHO. TIA.

SBB
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y