These are the numbers used by the BoD’s compensation committee to determine the 2010 bonuses for MNTA’s executive officers. Based on the a priori goals, the bottom-line weighted performance would have been 85%; however, a 25% post hoc adjustment was added, bringing the bottom-line figure to 110%. I would characterize this post hoc arithmetic as small-scale corporate malfeasance, but I suppose MNTA deserves some credit for disclosing it.
Weighting Actual Level Weighted Corporate Goal of Goal of AchievementAchievement
Enabling manufacture of enoxaparin . . 10% 130% 13.0%
Advancement of M356—regulatory . . . . 15% 70% 10.5%
Advancement of M356—development . . . . 10% 100% 10.0%
Advancement of FoB program .. . . . . . 15% 100% 15.0%
Advancement of M402 program . . . . . . 10% 70% 7.0%
Business development (partnerships) . . 15% 0% 0.0%
Advancement of “corporate strategy” . . 15% 130% 19.5%
*Bonus points 25% 100% 25.0% ==== ====== TOTAL 125% 110.0%
*Consists of the following items:
• Successfully managing FDA inspections of Chinese heparin suppliers; • Maintaining sole approval of enoxaparin; • Manufacturing for the enoxaparin program exceeding the 130% goal; • Successful management of enoxaparin-related litigation; and • Additional achievements in the M356 and FoB programs.