News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: DewDiligence post# 77683

Tuesday, 04/27/2010 3:55:09 PM

Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:55:09 PM

Post# of 257253
How MNTA Executed Against Its 2009 Internal Goals

These are the numbers used by the BoD’s compensation committee
to determine the 2009 bonuses for MNTA’s executive officers. Based
on the a priori goals, the bottom-line weighted performance would
have been 58.5%; however, a 10% post hoc adjustment was added,
bringing the bottom-line figure to 68.5%. I would characterize this
post hoc fudge factor as corporate malfeasance on a minor scale,
but MNTA does deserve some credit for disclosing it.


Weighting Actual Level Weighted
Corporate Goal of Goal of Achievement Achievement


FDA approval of Lovenox ANDA . . . . . 30% 0% 0.0%

Advancement of Copaxone program—US. . . 15% 100% 15.0%

Advancement of Copaxone program—EU. . . 5% 70% 3.5%

Advancement of glycoprotein
(FoB) program . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15% 100% 15.0%

Completion of M118 studies . . . . . . 10% 100% 10.0%

Advancement of “corporate strategy” . . 15% 100% 15.0%

“Financial discipline” . . . . . . . . 10% 0% 0.0%

Post hoc adjustment (fudge factor). . . 10% 100% 10.0%
==== =====
TOTAL 110% 68.5%


Source: Proxy statement for 2009 annual meeting on Form DEF14A, page 25 (http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1235010/000104746910004249/a2198205zdef14a.htm ).


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today