InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253412
Next 10
Followers 5
Posts 2508
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/22/2008

Re: Regulardoc post# 118640

Thursday, 04/21/2011 11:38:24 AM

Thursday, April 21, 2011 11:38:24 AM

Post# of 253412
So wouldn't the real trade have been to buy TEVA premarket? They fell more and should regain more if Copaxone isn't damaged. And they have a 13 PE, not expensive. And TEVA did move back up nicely from its' premarket low.

MNTA I think moves up more because it is undervalued regardless of Copaxone rather than falls because of Copaxone, which I always thought was more of a theory about it getting approved anytime soon. In fact, if MTNA takes 2-4 years to get approved, then Copaxone could well be in decline.

IMO since a lot of retail also own MNTA, it tends to trade down more easily than stocks like AMZN, NFLX, ETC. Likely some retail are leveraged, making it more likley they will sell quickly.

On sale is sort of relative thing, IMO MNTA hasn't been on sale since the price went close to 5 in 2008. Below 10 is on sale, down 4% premaket isn't much of a sale.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.