News Focus
News Focus
Followers 21
Posts 293
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/31/2004

Re: gump90 post# 163052

Friday, 04/29/2005 11:54:49 PM

Friday, April 29, 2005 11:54:49 PM

Post# of 359167
Then why do they conflict, Janice ?

"""""Glenn calculated the divvy ratios"""""

Roger Glenn don't make no mistakes.


As I'm sure you're aware, dividend ratios are always calculated on shares outstanding. Short shares have no effect on dividend ratios. The dividend is simply owed by the shorter, borrowed or naked, as has been demonstrated in tens of thousands of dividends from thousands of companies--all of which had short positions, and many of which had market markers and thus short positions without locates.

So what you're suggesting is that Glenn was not mistaken when he said that there were 1.5 trillion outstanding. This is certainly interesting as it conflicts with Mr. Casavant's statement implicit in the 8-K that there were only 770 million outstanding (prior to Nevada Minerals). It also conflicts with the filing with the state of Nevada which limits the company to 800 million authorized shares.

If you're right, then this company is in a lot more trouble than we have realized...and that's saying a lot.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today