VirTra Inc (VTSI)

[stormer]

The first story was that the low PPS wasn't good for some possible foreign sales. Apparently that alone wasn't a good enough reason to have a proxy and 100:1 RS. Because when the CC came around, the main reason seemed to be uplisting to NASDAQ. As brought up here many times, NASDAQ isn't even an option, and would be even further away should the conflicting director eliminating amendment pass. It would have been better if they didn't even mention NASDAQ.

Now this job add should let everyone know they are now serious about uplisting? It is now only an add and not yet a real person plodding along to get VTSI uplisted.

My problem is that I can't believe that so much trouble was just a mistake of getting things out of order. Those other amendments don't seem to be part of a mistake either.