Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,967.38
(
1.18%
)
US TECH 100
25,174.80
(
1.94%
)
Dow Jones
48,535.99
(
0.66%
)
Brent Oil
92.70
(
-2.90%
)
Bitcoin
74,305.99
(
0.13%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 34471
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

swampdonkey

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 7
Posts 726
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2009

swampdonkey

Re: stills999 post# 25894

Wednesday, 03/16/2011 2:47:16 PM

Wednesday, March 16, 2011 2:47:16 PM

Post# of 34471
The significance of FH is not fully known at this point but it can only be deemed a positive. FH wouldnt knowingly engage CCME if it were an outright fraud im pretty confident of that.
Do your DD in FH and you will see that they are often nominated as one of the best PR co's in the world. They have a reputation to behold.
The timing of FH is slightly unusual. Did CCME predict the possibility of a 10k non sign off and bring in FH for crises management? Remember that FH is PR not IR
Whilst the recent news release shows FH produced the document i know for a fact ( from the co ) that they were engaged 16 or so days ago

"The pinnacle in my career financially wasn't acquiring the rights for Baywatch but my investment in CCME in Spring of 2010" I owe Fernando a few drinks for that one" David Hasselhoff on LARRY KING

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Unleash the power of Level 2

Spot liquidity moves with access to US order books.

Sign Up