I've said this in the past and will say it again...data entry (F/S instead of a R/S split = unintentional)...selling without certs = intentional...there is 0 other ways to spin this...I'm not asking ST to be punished on the data entry thing (although one could argue given the # of reviews that should have happened...this was obviously not being reviewed...robo-signing ring a bell?)...BUT I am asking ST to be punished on the selling without certs...to me there are 0 excuses for that...there is no way shape or form that they should be allowed to get away with that...