I agree and I also think Mr DiGenova is rushing the merger because he doesn't want the shareholders knowing the financial history. 1. What money was received from stock sales and loans 2. Ownership break down 3. How the money was spent 4. What are the assets 5. What amount is recoverable and at what cost.
I'm a little confused with this comment. Aren't these the kind of questions that a GJ would certainly want answered?
And of so, aren't they going to be answered BEFORE the merger?
Isn't it a little backward to try and hide something by having a GJ date before the merger, or am I missing something here?