News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257302
Next 10
Followers 24
Posts 2537
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/26/2003

Re: jbog post# 113567

Friday, 01/28/2011 3:24:07 PM

Friday, January 28, 2011 3:24:07 PM

Post# of 257302

I think you're going to be surprised. Channel stuffing probably had a minor effect on the 4th quarter results. The run rate is probably much closer to $750m/$800m at this point.

How could channel stuffing not have had a major effect on Q4 performance? Sales declined from $292 million on 2/3 of a quarter to $170 million for a full quarter while percentage scripts increased throughout Q3 and Q4. Either there was a massive decline in sales price (which makes no economic sense) or channel stuffing had a material impact on Q4 performance. There could have been a minor impact on sales from treatments getting deferred until 2011. Q4 mL sales would have likely been 20-35% higher had they not been pushed into Q3. What else could reasonable explain Q3 vs. Q4 performance?

10nis

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today