InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 47
Posts 2530
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/16/2010

Re: B402 post# 126812

Friday, 01/21/2011 10:09:38 PM

Friday, January 21, 2011 10:09:38 PM

Post# of 233373
IMHO. If Ken & company thought Rusty Hole #2 results would be bad, there would be no reason to stake the additional claims linking Rusty and Shaylee. They would instead turn their attention (and their finances) to developing Cabot or one of the other properties where they might get more bang for their buck. Afterall, Cabot had visible gold and years of exploration by another (defunct) company. And we would have heard something about that. They must have confidence that Hole #2 has good results. Isn't it possible for them to know SOMETHING about that core before it goes to the lab? Handheld detectors exist. The paid geologists would probably know something about that core too before it went for testing.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KATX News