Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

Lebaneseproud, in asking the question i wasn't suggesting either way, (haven't been
following Lebanon lately) it was this sentence which prompted the post, and the question ..

"In a startling about-turn, current Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri said last month that the accusations leveled
by him and his allies that Syria was involved in the murder of his father were "political" and had been withdrawn.

Initial thoughts on yours without reading any more of recent news around there ..

"Yes, funny they waited until the Tribunal report is about to be
released for this other country SYRIA to issue these arrest warrants."

You wouldn't strategically do it really early on, would you? Hariri's, recent admission that his charges against
Syria were just political, and his withdrawal of, might pose some question over the impartiality of the committee??

"The actions of Syria and Hizbullah(Iran's puppet) seem very desperate
to me. Why dont they just wait to see what the report says first?"

Ummm, strategy?

"Oh yeah , because they already know they helped Hizbullah pull off this assassination and are trying
to deflect attention. I'll stick with Obama, Hillary Clinton and the legit Lebanese government on this one."

One way, or the other, and it could well be true, that's what the West would what us to believe. The legit Lebanon
government? The ex Hariri one, you mean.? The one who made the admission and the withdrawal above?
You would unequivocably trust them after that? And do the others deserve unequivocal trust?

Note, I am not taking sides here, just saying the Hariri admission and withdrawal,
seems to me a significant event, which on the face of it you seem to have ignored?