InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251721
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119569
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: akasidney86 post# 111405

Thursday, 12/23/2010 4:23:36 PM

Thursday, December 23, 2010 4:23:36 PM

Post# of 251721
Although Teva presumably expected the low-volume Copaxone NDA to be rejected, there was, of course, a minute chance for approval, which would have given Teva a chance to hold onto more of the Copaxone franchise.

In the more likely event that the NDA was rejected (which has now happened), Teva realized a propaganda benefit that management will now trumpet to anyone who is gullible enough to listen (e.g. jbog in #msg-58084585).

All told, Teva had a considerable upside in submitting an NDA for low-volume Copaxone. The only downside was running a single trial whose cost was trivial for a company of Teva's size.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.