Zeev's Turnips Patch-No Politics (ZEEV)

[mish]

Maybe you should reconsider what you think is stupid and wrong.

http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15813606
I think that this run will "eventually" take us to 3800/4300 on the Naz (about next April?), you don't want to know what is supposed to happen after that (g).
Zeev

How about this one
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=15921780
After that, I see an extremely fast and furious bull move which should get us to the 13500 on the Dow and the 3800 to 4200 on the Naz. Sometime next year, however, the seed of a new bear market may be sown, and that one may be accompanied with a real recession (unlike the current bear, which I believe will be tagged as a recession-less bear market).
Zeev

OR THIS ONE REPEATED IN DECEMBER
A totally absurd to the Moon call with an alternate that in retrospect looks equally silly from where we are
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=16785746
Justa, to make things simpler, the original scenario has a "toda moon" phase next year with the Naz getting very close to 3000 late in the second or third quarter. The Alternate scenario does not have a "to da moon" phase, instead it has a period equivalent to the May/August period of last year. If we do not get to about 1793 before the end of this month, I'll go with the "alternate", if the December decline gets to at least 1793, with the "original", the actual intermediate target levels have been shown to be wrong already, so, I go to "live" with it. (g).
Zeev

I am not going to research post from March where you got bearsish near the March low but I assure you that you did.

Nor am I going to research your call for a higher top extending beyond the high we did get in March.

I will assure you that my memory is quite fine.

Again you are missing the entire point that is now blown so far out of water as to be meaningless.

I was asked a simple question as to why I was not following your calls to the letter. I selected the Naz 3000 call as an example. No harm was intended, but looking back it is easy to see that you are always more optimistic than warranted. I could provide more examples but I believe I made my point, and I believe my memory has proven to be quite accurate.

Again I offer my apologies to to because I meant no harm.
You have taught me many many things I would not have figured out on my own (about TICK TRIN volume reversals) and probably countless other things as well. Few can achieve the trading results that you post. Your problem, quite simply is that those results are too damn good. You can trade your way out of any mess but others that try to follow you can not come close to "turnip trading".

That said, this has been a bear market and you have been overly optimistic most of the way down. Those links prove it! Yet I concede many PERFECTLY TIMED HEAD TO THE HILLS CALLS. I concede many good buy signals as well.

Turnip posts are linked to my board on the FOOL because WE LIKE YOU. We want to hear what you have to say. Everyone values your input and knowlege ON A VAST ARRAY OF TOPICS.

You are one of the brightest people I know.
Some of your calls are ammazingly accurate.
Those calls are appreciated.

Again I apologise but I do have to defend myself.
My simple reasoning for not following your every call is that you are not ALWAYS correct. No one is. That is all I was trying to say, and somehow a simple post got blown up 2000% out of proportion.

I do not know if you accept this apology or not, but I do wish to remain friends.

Mish