News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257262
Next 10
Followers 7
Posts 660
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/30/2005

Re: zipjet post# 109881

Friday, 12/03/2010 10:09:37 AM

Friday, December 03, 2010 10:09:37 AM

Post# of 257262
The beauty of the strategy of patenting the tools used to prove sameness, and then pre-emptively suing to protect them is that it will force any other producer to show how they prove sameness and to prove that it is different. MNTA is simply saying 'if you're going to beat us, it won't be with our ball'.

From what I've read it would be possible, in the FDA ANDA process, for others to use the MNTA patented techniques in their proof of sameness (FDA wonks and patent atorneys correct if mis-stated). However, in the event that the FDA sameness hurdle was met with their tools and an approval granted, how it will be done in manufacturing remains protected regardless of manufacturing site (if they want to sell in the US), and MNTA with this suit is going scorched earth. Whether there are other roads to prove sameness remains to be seen. One thing is for sure, however; MNTA won't be beat with it's own inventions.

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today