Cassie: By your command:
Dear Robert:
Rarely do I see someone post boldly that you and the company have engaged in publishing intentionally false PRs. But see this:
"Posted by: Cassandra
In reply to: jwperk who wrote msg# 68310
Date:3/8/2005 6:20:32 PM
Post #of 68333
e.Digital did not have anything to do with the prototype of the embedded digeplayer that was "unveiled" by Inflight Canada at WAEA so e.Digital's PR was false and misleading.
I don't know what e.Digital's role might be with the model that Wencor went on to develop without Inflight Canada and that Boyer displayed today. I certainly don't accept Putnam's assurance they are actively "working with" Wencor on it.
There is no reason not to let shareholders know what revenue-producing role e.Digital will have. NRE fees? Manufacturing? None?
It's hard to believe that shareholder's continue to fall for Putnam's ambiguous statements that are nothing but innuendo.
~Cassandra"
Was e.Digital's PR "false and misleading?" or was that a patently false statement of fact and a direct attack on the company and management?
If so, as a shareholder, I respectfully demand that you initiate necessary action.
Please advise.
"Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance." --Sam Brown
Live long and prosper
