News Focus
News Focus
Followers 2078
Posts 128319
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/13/2006

Re: Scragapenny post# 86677

Saturday, 11/20/2010 10:20:24 PM

Saturday, November 20, 2010 10:20:24 PM

Post# of 111215
This is why so many PINKS use the NSS excuse... IMHNO ... they can just claim ( or think they can ) they must have not understood that is how this stuff works and actually thought that there was a HUGE ILLEGAL NSS out to crush da company based on the numbers they were looking at on da books wink

Scragapenny Member Level Share Saturday, November 20, 2010 11:48:12 AM
Re: butterfly89 post# 86673 Post # of 86824
Wow my math was off. So if 43 million shares have traded in those dates, how many of those were covers?

This is where the NSS detection via an audit by the company bothers me.

Let's use my company as an example. It is not publically traded, but let's suppose it is.

An investor buys 100 shares from someone who holds 200 shares. That person's cert is split in my company book. The original owner's book entry is retired, and two new entries and certificates must be issued. One for the original owner reflecting 100 shares, and one for the new owner reflecting 100 shares. In my book, I have 400 shares accounted for, but only 200 shares exisit. There was no NSS, but someone could look at the book entries and assume that there are air shares out there based on percieved trading of 400 shares.

Edit ~ For the Record: This is exactly how book entries for my company stock are handled.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y