Well, I guess we'll see if this security is really a dog or not. And as long as it takes could be a long long time? I wouldn't hold my breath.
You're wondering how the meeting went? I think its clear how it went. 70% controlling interest.
And this security is not a dog. Its a security going thru a process for as long as it takes!
Wonder how the meeting went? No way this dog can be resurrected from the dead. And if it was there's no way it will bring value to any existing shareholders... IMHO!
Yeah, that pesky comma keeps coming up huh
Looks like there was a proxy vote yesterday for 8000, inc. How is this possible given the history of this security?
8000 inc Stock Certificate (Real Proof)
Etrade (Morgan Stanley) Broker Correspondence on EIGH naked short position
Bryant Response to SEC
Did you notice the "Jury Trial Demanded"?
8000 inc is a private entity
Official notice via the SEC court (later found the SEC acted in an unconstitutional manner)
320 million illegal naked short identified
Letter to SEC identifying there is a naked short position asking for SEC/Finra remedy
13 Broker identified with an excess/imbalance of shares
Subject: Re: 8000inc ticker EIGH
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:43:11 -0400
Your email to XXXXXXXXX was forwarded to me for response.
Since 8000Inc is not and has never been eligible for full services at DTC, DTCC is unaware of any restrictions that may be placed on this security by brokers. But in any case, no action that DTCC or DTC would take would have any impact on trading activities, but would only impact the electronic clearing and settlement of securities held at DTC. My suggestion is that you speak directly to your broker to answer any further questions you may have about 8000Inc.
Director, Corporate Communications
SEC in-house judges violate right to jury trial, appeals court rules
Agency powers under threat in U.S. Supreme Court FTC and SEC cases
U.S. Supreme Court rules federal courts have jurisdiction to hear challenges of FTC, SEC
Does anybody want to show Jacob Mohs that he has custody of a security that should not be trading???
Rule 144 violation*
How did “commagate” work out?
That's good news. Thanks for the update.
Just called Signature Stock Transfer (SST), who is the Transfer Agent for 8000 Inc. SST confirmed the stock certificates are free trading in certificate form only! Signature Stock Transfer is also aware that 8000, inc was activated in the State of Nevada on December 30th 2022.
He would need the stock certificates to be in the majority. Any electronic volume does not reflect this behavior. Real certs can not trade electronically. Non DTC eligible!!!
$EIGH 3.98m vol on 10/20/22, what if Jacob Mohs has been accumulating the shares past few years and also bought the shares from Jonathan, Monk, etc.? By now he might be holding the controlling shares, the reason he wants to hijack this shell through custodianship.
SPAMming this board now to get the Naive to sign up/subscribe. Sad....
So..did a hedge fund get custodianship of this?
To be honest, the EIGH corporate action never went thru in the past. The SEC was notified and did nothing to enforce the settlement rules and regulations of an identified naked short position. Correspondence between brokers even identified fails to deliver in the 8000 Inc disclosure statements. Also, If you remember, there were a few solutions to resolve this private security trading illegally on the OTC. One of them was to cancel all common and transfer to preferred with a new cusip. That cusip was created successfully. So it really boils down to how does a hedge fund take over the custodianship of a private entity that should not be trading electronically in the first place?
Well if the financing is there to support any reporting and handing fees with OTCM and the TA, Signature Stock Transfer, then I guess we shall see how it plays out.
The problem is with the OTCM IDQS system. After all fillings are up to date and fees paid that need to be reviewed and processed, there is no guarantee any enforcement will be made. The 15c211 quotation process is broken. In my opinion, it is no different than CRGP (formerly their TA was Signature Stock Transfer) going private corporate action is stuck in right now. The attempted hijacking over custodianship certainly made things interesting (somehow quotation was granted and it traded for a year, I would assume illegally). All of that didn't change the fact that an imbalance of shares was identified in Nebraska court and was never resolved.
EIGH would be in the same situation where all of its securities trading on the OTC, which essentially are obligations (debt) that is illegal, would be required to be settled.
So is this another attempted hijacking or is this an entity protecting the shareholder's rights to what was perceived as real property when it was sold to them by their brokers?
Another example is the $MMTLP matter. Its was created via a special dividend as a private preffered security that was allowed to illegally trade. There is a pending corporate action in progress. Shareholders are stuck because of a FINRA U3 halt for "extraordinary events"
Seem like all 3 tickers CRGP, MMTLP, and EIGH are private securities by way of slight differences that should not be trading while the SEC, OTCM and FINRA do not know what to do because they got caught in their failures of governance in the financial system.
Will this new custodianship move benefit the old shareholders of $EIGH who still own the shares?
Interesting facts on Jacob Mohs the new custodian of EIGH....
Look at the address on his purchase and sale agreement
Why did he choose this space?
Conveniently next to Fidelity
As mentioned in the above link
Yes, he popped up during the time when SSM Monopoly tried to hijack the custodianship of CRGP. Sagar Raich showed proof to the Nevada State court that it was defrauded and the custodianship ruling was overturned to Clement Lockwood. An affidavit was filed with the court.
Jacob Mohs was attempting to buy private placements after CRGP was heavily shorted from .02. to trips...Just odd timing in my opinion. Not sure if this guy is the real deal or not.
Also during the SEC vs Johnathan Bryant litigation, JB answer to the complaint showed EIGH listed as a private company under 8000 inc, not 8000, inc.
The SEC identified 8000 inc as non-DRS eligible. So what is Jacob Mohs trying to do by taking custodianship over this entity?
12/30/2022 12/30/2022 20222844779 Certificate of Amendment by Custodian
12/30/2022 12/30/2022 20222844777 Certificate of Revival
12/30/2022 12/30/2022 20222844777 Annual List
Can someone with access validate this filing?
Recent filings for 8000, INC.
30 Dec 2022 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT BY CUSTODIAN
30 Dec 2022 CERTIFICATE OF REVIVAL
Good to see you still around too onehundredmph.
Wow that is some good reading. Would love to see justice finally prevail.
[img]Thanks for pointing all that out. I'll keep an eye out for news regarding these matters.
Also this happened recently
This person is responsible for the governance/review of the 15c211 and regsho data in the financial system for 18 years. Conflict of interest?
Its been forever, glad to see you around.
Are you following the mmtlp situation? I believe the illegal naked short practices that we have fought against in the past will finally be resolved.
Both securities are private which traded illegally on the OTC and had the same market makers involved. Both securities involved an issued a special dividend to expose a naked short. Even if EIGH had its dividend frozen, it still exposed it. The disclosure statements are a record reflecting the alleged crimes made against the company and requested the SEC and FINRA to enforce its settlement of transaction rules and regulations in order to protect investors, which it still has not done yet. The request for resolution is still open today.
Nothing happened with EIGH before 2016 because there was nothing to force the issue. All the naked short matters were hiding behind the immunity in the corporate veil of securities laws in the stock borrowing program at the DTCC/NSCC/Obligation Wharehouse.
Well all that changed after the Supreme Court decision allowed/opened the door for jurisdiction and liability to be used against all participants including the DTCC and FINRA.
This law opened the opportunity for all investors to defend their property in a court of law.
The margin requirements have also changed because of the realization of securitized debt obligations is plentiful and unmanageable in the financial system.
Many CEO's are joining efforts for the first time ever to defend their companies against these illegal practices.
Fyi in 2022 prior EIGH litigation can be considered unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
EIGH is still trading illegally with volume until this day.
I believe we have reached new territory here where a final resolution is upon us.
They're many court cases challenging FINRA right now via the mmtlp situation. The matter of naked shorting cannot be ignored anymore.
I believe Congress will have to get involved to force the regulatory agencies to do their functioning purpose in protecting the economy of the United States against the nefarious actions that threaten its stability.
The legal framework is all set for this to be resolved soon in my opinion.
All it takes is one company to expose it legally via "Discovery" and the pin to the grenade in the Obligation Wharehouse blows up and forces a massive settlement of failures to deliver in the system. Thats how I see it.
I think she's done. Never to see the light of day again.
$EIGH Time and Sales 1/4/2023
This is one of the best legal discussions that describe in great detail the level of Naked Short Selling I have seen in the last 13 years of my trading and investor experience in the US market.
Excellent source of understanding on how significant the threat that exists against the economy of the United States and the theft of private property of its citizens/participants.
Every single EIGH shareholder should understand and share
Legal Advocate for Financial Reform
"We ask the SEC to take action as this information suggests (and, in our opinion prove). We believe the SEC and the public have been misled, probably defrauded and your rules (and those of FINRA) have been ignored. And for those reasons plead that the SEC and/or FINRA require a buy-in and/or take other preemptive regulatory action that will reverse this fraud upon both EIGH specifically and, more generally, public markets. "
CUSIP NUMBER: 28251Q 208
ISIN NUMBER: US28251Q2084
ISSUE DESCRIPTION: PFD
Very interesting video where a CEO reports FINRA tells him Naked Short positions in OTC Nasdaq companies moved offshore to avoid reporting the "Failure to Delivers"
Squeeze, or a Jerry Williams (aka Mr. Monk) scam? Geeze, fun days tho!
Looks like you didn't make it to Easter. Butthay, you gott Christmas and the Superbowl in. Now you've been REVOKED.
Anybody hitting this ?
I know of a stock I think should run It’s a better option for me and lithium is to hot to pass up right now
You are correct.
yeahh i couldnt find a shred of information regarding it
whats going on here?
So it’s going to pop off here or what lol