The methodology for tracking unemployment figures was changed during the Reagan or Clinton administration, I can't recall which. It was at that time that we stopped counting people who's unemployment benefits had expired but had not yet found work, as unemployed. And really, wouldn't such a person reasonably be considered "unemployed"?
the closest thing you'll find to being the true numbers published by the BLS is the U-6, not the more broadly reported and often quoted U-3.
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary" George Orwell
"The only thing worth globalizing is dissent." Arundhati Roy