Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,764.63
(
2.23%
)
US TECH 100
24,206.80
(
2.82%
)
Dow Jones
47,758.81
(
2.52%
)
Brent Oil
93.10
(
-8.02%
)
Bitcoin
71,138.00
(
-1.18%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 252256
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Vader

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 2312
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/06/2004

Vader

Re: dhamster post# 72660

Wednesday, 03/09/2005 3:28:17 PM

Wednesday, March 09, 2005 3:28:17 PM

Post# of 252256
DHAM..if I may...


42M would be revenues...not earnings...

42 - say 16 burn = earnings = 26 M...

Using your math, 26 M / 100 M shares = .26 / share @ 20 = $5.20 now!!!! (that's at a pe of 20)

I think that the pe is flawed!! (Guys if 42M happens this year...what exponent x 42 will happen next year)

Should be more like 40 or better based on some discount to the growth rate...all imho!
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today