Thanks for the link HattieTheWitch.
The comment at 57:05 was that "we do know that we have established sameness {and the application is with OBP}."
It really is the same as the first comment. At a minimum Teva is saying they know from their own sources, inquiries, information, that they have sameness. They are not saying that the FDA has confirmed for them they have sameness. But then again, they are stating this beyond they "believe" they have sameness. Which is a step more certain.
All in all, this parsing of the language in this matter is becoming less persuasive. "We know" is beyond "we believe" which is the term they were previously using.
Sometimes if you need to think too hard about something, perhaps you have to think so hard about it because you are trying to get at something that is not there, or cannot be gotten at.
Here, sure, there is some ambiguity, but I would say the trend is favoring Teva as they have moved beyond "believe" into "we know".
Tinker
