I was referring to the many recent posts here and on the DNPI board which certainly have no constructive purpose.
Facts? Yes, it's true that what we were promised and what was delivered are very different. And don't get me wrong, I think that's very poor business. But, it's also in poor taste to attack a man personally, when we don't even know who is to blame for those inconsistencies, or what the intentions were/are. It's obvious this situation is very complicated, and all I'm saying is let's remain rational... Considering NIR's involvement, there was a possibility this was a no-win from the start. That's why I'm reserving judgement, I think this could still go either way (from a straight-up, rational perspective... but emotionally, I agree this sucks).
