Wednesday, March 02, 2005 6:05:51 PM
"counsels potential negligence" - I don't know the legal requirements of timing, statute of limitation, etc., however, from a logical point of view, it seems any actual damage to IDCC's patent assets is still pending a ruling by the Court of Appeal.
If the Court of Appeal reverses the PSJ reinstatement so the PSJs are returned to vacated status, then there is perhaps no actual harm to our 2G patent assets (although the company has incurred a lot of extra legal expenses) so F&J may be off the hook (due to no damages) even if they were negligent in effecting the settlement.
Ranger:
Yes, the legal matters are surely very confusing: So far, we have my analysis, Loop's, Oso's, JK's, Ghors', Nok's, IDCC's, Judge Lynn's, and your's to name just a few perspectives articulated on this forum for the benefit of all. I would like to believe in all of the very compelling points that have been raised here by you and others.
Currently, Judge Lynn and Nok have the same and prevailing point of view. Shortly, the Court of Appeal will trump us all.
At the moment, Judge Lynn's analysis is impossible to ignore and she sees things somewhat differently than many folks here, so I struggle to understand the true facts, her logic, and the law.
I find all the information and perspectives provided on this forum invaluable to me in attempting to understand our investment. Hopefully my public struggle to understand the issues affecting our investment is helpful to some folks.
Please do not interpret my probing or arguments as bashing or being slippery. Rather, I want to look at all the facets to get to the bottom of the matters affecting my investment. I may take a position to explore it. I can, do, and reserve the right to change my opinions from time to time as pursuaded to do so.
IDCC now has a lot riding on the Nok arbitration and the Appeal. Unfortunately, a very favorable arbitration result will not cure all the potential damage to our key 2G and 3G patent assets which are now at great risk. Only a comprehensive settlement with Nok can achieve that, so that is my greatest hope, however unlikely it may be.
At this point, I want to read the briefs on appeal and have taken the initiative to obtain them. I am currently trying to figure out, as best I can, if Management and F&J, by their (mis)handling of Nok, may have critically damaged our key 2G assets and subjected our key 3G patent assets (and perhaps the company) to great peril.
All MO,
Corp_Buyer
If the Court of Appeal reverses the PSJ reinstatement so the PSJs are returned to vacated status, then there is perhaps no actual harm to our 2G patent assets (although the company has incurred a lot of extra legal expenses) so F&J may be off the hook (due to no damages) even if they were negligent in effecting the settlement.
Ranger:
Yes, the legal matters are surely very confusing: So far, we have my analysis, Loop's, Oso's, JK's, Ghors', Nok's, IDCC's, Judge Lynn's, and your's to name just a few perspectives articulated on this forum for the benefit of all. I would like to believe in all of the very compelling points that have been raised here by you and others.
Currently, Judge Lynn and Nok have the same and prevailing point of view. Shortly, the Court of Appeal will trump us all.
At the moment, Judge Lynn's analysis is impossible to ignore and she sees things somewhat differently than many folks here, so I struggle to understand the true facts, her logic, and the law.
I find all the information and perspectives provided on this forum invaluable to me in attempting to understand our investment. Hopefully my public struggle to understand the issues affecting our investment is helpful to some folks.
Please do not interpret my probing or arguments as bashing or being slippery. Rather, I want to look at all the facets to get to the bottom of the matters affecting my investment. I may take a position to explore it. I can, do, and reserve the right to change my opinions from time to time as pursuaded to do so.
IDCC now has a lot riding on the Nok arbitration and the Appeal. Unfortunately, a very favorable arbitration result will not cure all the potential damage to our key 2G and 3G patent assets which are now at great risk. Only a comprehensive settlement with Nok can achieve that, so that is my greatest hope, however unlikely it may be.
At this point, I want to read the briefs on appeal and have taken the initiative to obtain them. I am currently trying to figure out, as best I can, if Management and F&J, by their (mis)handling of Nok, may have critically damaged our key 2G assets and subjected our key 3G patent assets (and perhaps the company) to great peril.
All MO,
Corp_Buyer
Recent IDCC News
- InterDigital to Spotlight Sensing Expertise and Innovation at IEEE ICC’26 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/26/2026 08:00:00 AM
- InterDigital Expands IoT Licensing Push With New Fintech Patent Agreement (IDCC) • IH Market News • 05/19/2026 02:46:36 PM
- InterDigital signs license agreement with fintech company • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/19/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/06/2026 08:12:13 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/05/2026 08:52:23 PM
- Investor Conference Presentations Scheduled as InterDigital (IDCC) Engages Market Through June • IH Market News • 05/05/2026 02:32:32 PM
- InterDigital to Present at Four Upcoming Investor Conferences • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/05/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form ARS - Annual Report to Security Holders • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 08:19:31 PM
- Form DEFA14A - Additional definitive proxy soliciting materials and Rule 14(a)(12) material • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 08:17:58 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 08:15:45 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/30/2026 12:34:10 PM
- InterDigital Announces Financial Results for First Quarter 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/30/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form SCHEDULE 13G/A - Statement of Beneficial Ownership by Certain Investors: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 08:11:55 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 11:00:56 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:59:52 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:59:12 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:58:36 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:56:57 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:56:23 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:55:47 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:54:42 AM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/20/2026 08:30:51 PM
- InterDigital’s NAB Showcase to Spotlight HDR Innovation for Advanced and Ad-Supported Streaming • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/16/2026 12:00:00 PM
