InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[redhot]

Loop-That the settlement was based on a motion to vacate, rather than actual order to vacate, might seem an unjust stretch to accomodate Nok by ignoring the parties' intent.

But how is it possible Ericy and IDCC made this apparently foolish error? Could it have been done by reason of some advantage to 1 of the parties? E.g.: Would Ericy have balked at making settlement dependant on an actual Court Order? Would such dependancy have alerted Judge Lynn to some risk in making that Order?
The unknowns are overly burdensome.