InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251721
Next 10
Followers 826
Posts 119569
Boards Moderated 14
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: dewophile post# 106254

Wednesday, 10/13/2010 12:51:05 PM

Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:51:05 PM

Post# of 251721
This news actually is consequential, but not for the reason most investors think. On a recent webcast (#msg-54378320), Teva’s Bill Marth told investors that, following the Court’s denial of NVS/MNTA’s request for a summary judgment based on indefiniteness, the Copaxone case was effectively decided in Teva’s favor already and that Teva would probably ask the Court for a summary judgment that all of its patents are valid and infringed.

Well, since Marth made those comments about a month ago, there has been no motion by Teva for a summary judgment. Instead, we now know that Teva has been negotiating with NVS as to how much advance notice Teva will receive when NVS launches generic Copaxone.

Why is this notable? Because there’s no way in hell NVS would launch without a favorable outcome to the patent case in the District Court. (NVS might launch at-risk prior to a decision by the appellate court, however.) In other words, Teva would have no reason to be concerned about receiving advance notice of NVS’ launch unless Teva thought they might lose the patent case.

Once again, Bill Marth is exposed as a BS artist.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.