I stand by the analysis in #msg-53629665, which is IMO the simplest way to project MNTA’s near-term cash flow.
p.s. You said your post uses three pieces of published data but I see only two: NVS’ cumulative Lovenox development costs and NVS’ 6-week sales projection (which is actually a lower bound). What is the third piece of published data?
“The efficient-market hypothesis may be the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated in any area of human knowledge!”