News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257253
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122793
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: DFRAI post# 102209

Monday, 08/23/2010 3:33:30 PM

Monday, August 23, 2010 3:33:30 PM

Post# of 257253
Projecting MNTA’s net profits:

Since MNTA gave investors an implicit cash-flow projection on the 2Q10 CC (#msg-53185820), we might as well use this information rather than trying to derive MNTA’s cash flow from guesses regarding in-market sales of Lovenox and NVS/MNTA’s market share. Because the $160M number derived in #msg-53185820 is a rock-bottom figure, I’m comfortable multiplying it by 1.5 to arrive at a $240M annualized run rate for MNTA’s cash flow from Lovenox on a pro forma basis (i.e. excluding the deductions NVS will make to recoup its development expenses).

Until NVS has recouped its Lovenox development costs (which will take 2-3 quarters), the amount MNTA will report on the top line of its income statement will be half the above amount, which comes to $30M per quarter. This ought to easily outweigh the $13M per quarter that MNTA has been burning in recent quarters (#msg-52864485) and yield a quarterly profit in the $15-20M range during the first 2-3 quarters.

From a valuation standpoint, I think investors will look ahead and will make two adjustments to the net-profit numbers MNTA reports during the first 2-3 quarters by:

1. Doubling the reported Lovenox cash flow (because this is what happens once NVS has recouped its development costs); and

2. Applying the statutory tax rate to MNTA’s net income (because the NOL’s will eventually run out).

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today