News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 216
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2010

Re: lawrenzo post# 186910

Tuesday, 08/03/2010 3:41:08 PM

Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:41:08 PM

Post# of 202893
Wow, now thats twisting the pretzel

MATW doesn't get to keep those products

the Products shall be non-exclusive

and if EI takes them back the carrier they chose becomes liable or in MATW's view

Risk of loss regarding said units shall forever pass to Eternal Image upon delivery to Eternal Image’s carrier


Now, you still would have to deal with breach of contract, which the BINDING LOU is

If EI needs the inventory they should buy the products so they can sell them - if EI does not need the inventory MATW can not sell them on their own because MATW has breached the deal and is no longer authorized to sell the products - so it behooves MATW to follow through (my interpretation)

I don't even follow this logic below in quotes

and if EI is unable to buy the products back from matthews the LOU is history


if MATW doesn't abide by the LOU its toast then, not if EI doesn't buy the inventory from MATW

The ragged tooth shark can turn on a dime and twist itself up, much like your post does

This is clearly understandable if you read what you posted

BTW, when did EI have the ST and Vatican products for sale?

I must have missed that when talking with Eternal Image

MLB has been their lobster and butter for the most part

Vatican should blow that out of the water

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today