News Focus
News Focus
Followers 13
Posts 281
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2009

Re: None

Thursday, 06/24/2010 1:28:15 PM

Thursday, June 24, 2010 1:28:15 PM

Post# of 352925
FDA approval thoughts: Here is my assesment on where we stand. On June 16
the company announced that ".. For its Allay menstrual pain relief product,
BioElectronics has formally requested the change of its application from a
510(k) to Section 513(f)(2) de novo review". This is very significant. If
you read the FDA guide lines on "Request for Evaluation of Automatic Class
III Designation (de novo process), fully and carefully here is what you
learn:

(1) The FDA has issued a NSE (Not-substantially Equivalent) letter to the
company. Joe Noel has acknowledged the receipt of the NSE letter. This
means the 510K review by FDA for the Allay product is complete. A post by
a person called Mike (Thanks!) on Joe Noel's web site triggered this
acknowledgement and also my analysis of the situation.

(2) A de novo request is to be sumbitted within 30 days of the NSE
determination.

(3) In the NSE letter or during the 510K review process, FDA indicates to
the requester if they (FDA) thinks

(a) the devices are low risk and thus are appropriate for class II/class I
classification through the denovo process; or

(b) if they think there are significant unresolved safety and efficacy
issues; or

(c) if the FDA considers the device to have significant risk and class III
designation is approriate in which case a premarket approval (PMA) request
should be filed.

The fact that the company has filed a request for Evlauation of the
automatic class III designation means that (a) is the case and (b) and (c)
are not true.

(4) FDA is required to respond within 60 days of the filing of the de novo
request, which will be mid-August.

Now, I dont understand why the company is not publicizing these facts. In
other words, I surmise that they have had communication from the FDA which
has led to the filing of the de novo request. These communications should
have clearly indicated that FDA considers the devices to be low risk and
without significant unresloved safely and efficiacy issues.

I posted a message to Joe Noels website and he said he would bring these
questions to Andy Whelan but have not heard back about it yet. I am still
waiting.

Can I ask people on this forum to look at the FDA guide lines and the
company's press release and post your comments and thoughts.

FDA: (http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm080195.htm)

Company's press release: (http://www.mdtmag.com/News/AP/2010/06/Additional-Research-and-Findings-Strengthen-510%28k%29-Applications-and-Add-Three-New-Products/)

In summary it seems that class II designation for Allay is round the corner
(mid Aug). Once that happens the rest of the devices will get the same
classfication using Allay as the predicate (they essentially the same).
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y