InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[quartzman0]

"As was previously noted, the panel chairman while agreeing to arrange a "hearing" in Texas for Ericsson to answer the subpoena stated they were not persuaded of the usefullness of the hearing."

Isn't that a really telling piece of information? Why would the arb panel have no interest in those documents? The only conclusion is because they have already decided that the Ericcson/Sony papers have no impact upon their decision. The optimist in me says that is because they have already decided that Ericcson is a trigger, no wait a minute - it is because they have already decided that Ericsson is not a trigger. No wait again....

Q