"What do you think?" Well what I think is that you take your assumptions and opinions and present them as fact.
"It's only a lawsuit now because M&M refuse to pay their debts. once more reasonable management come in, the issues will be settled as new management will recognize this for what it is and pay off debts to avoid additional legal expenses."
For example, you don't know the particulars of these lawsuits any more so than 3rd grader understands calculus. It's possible M&M simply refused to pay their debts. I don't know the particulars, any more than you, only I'm not making any assumptions. And I'm certainly not presenting my opinions or assumptions as fact. Rather, I've only stated the simple truth of the matter in distinguishing a potential liability from secured and unsecured debt. And I wouldn't have even bothered making the distinction if you and others hadn't been so busy distorting those details.
"You on the other hand make it appear as though these cases will go to trial - hense a real lawsuit."
Patch, you need to take a logic class because yours is faulty. If those suits are not real lawsuits, then why did the plaintiffs file them in court and why are they called lawsuits?
Regarding your allegation that I make it appear like these "lawsuits" are real "lawsuits," I'll plead the 5th since I don't know how to make pigs fly. Until Webster tells me a lawsuit is anything other than a lawsuit, and as long as these suits are considered by the court to be lawsuits, I'll have to refer to them as lawsuits. Wheeewww Patch. Actually, I never said anything about the suits but the obvious. That being the as yet uncertain outcome and the possibility of taking years to resolve.
As far as any new management, you have no idea how they'll handle these suits. Again, you're presenting your assumptions and opinions as fact, which IMO, only distorts the truth.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
