InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 620
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/26/2010

Re: moneyezz post# 16899

Monday, 06/07/2010 6:53:50 AM

Monday, June 07, 2010 6:53:50 AM

Post# of 22746
I really hope so. But I don't think the SEC really cares about what info this board found on ACLH.

Again, I hope to get as much money back as possible but in the end they stated that they had contact with BP and that was false.

That a reseller had contact with BP really does not matter... Ancon has nothing to do with ACLH except that they resell... And that does not give ACLH the right to PR that they(ACLH) have contact with BP.


also the contractor's VP persoanlly took aclh's product to the command center and submitted it.



Thats execly the problem... Its the VP of Ancon... ACLH has nothing to do with that.

But... making money off of this after the halt would make me extremely happy:)... If the 'to come' PR states that they have a contract with BP it's going to be off the hook

All is IMO. I only trade for myself and I am no financial expert. GLTA always.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.