You keep referring to me as this "duke" person, which I can assure you I'm not or know who they are.
I don't believe in hidden fortunes, magic, bad dudes dying like in the movies, or any other mythical outcomes.
What I want to ask you is that as part of the defense in this court case, it's shown and proven that the bonds were legitimately assigned to the company for the given time frame and to be used by the company for said projects (remember, they are time sensitive instruments, Harris did not "own them"), does that not change every other accusation and make them moot? We already know the bonds are real, they trade all the time. It's how they were accounted for and if Harris "had" them when he said he did.
How can you call it a pump and dump, when everything revolves around the bonds? So harris pumped and the crooks dumped? How does that work out? If the bond ownership was a scam, then he also broke SOX rules and he’ll spend a long time in the slammer, right? If the bonds are real, then what happens to the hundreds of millions of shares that were dumped? The 6:1?
If the bonds are real, then all hell breaks loose right? Then at that point, you do understand what would happen right? Also would you not be happy that after all this time it's found that the one thing that everything has pivoted off of the last 4 years (said bonds in question) is shown to be valid, now you might have a chance of getting your money back and then some? Or do you not care about that? Many others participated in this who have not gotten in trouble (arlitt, alexandar), but the main focus is on the person who executed the 6:1.
Let’s continue to follow the case, and we’ll know in due time what the outcome is.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
