if handcamp(or any other property) is put into the shell,and ken owns the shell and not katx then realistically what fruit that handcamp yields would not be on the books for katx correct?if so how does that benefit the shareholders of katx? i know some here trust ken,however the company needs to address this a.s.a.p because im not liking this "ken could put whatever he wants into the shell".so is it possible for ken to "dilute katx"and leave the shareholders holding nothing?