Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

Well, your statement directly conflicts with the filings currently published (as I have proved here on the board with direct links to the filings).

Here is another little confusing tidbit:

I have run accross two statements in the 10K which seem to contradict each other. The first is in the header of the most recent 10K published:

====================================================================================

X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED: August 31, 2009


OR


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from ___________ to ___________


Commission file number: 333-85072


RTG VENTURES, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Florida 59-3666743
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)


c/o Paykin, Krieg &Adams, LLP
185 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
(Address of principal executive offices)


[phone]
(Issuer's telephone number)


Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class Name of exchange on which registered



Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:


Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
(Title of class)
=============================================================================================

The second is a statement at the very top of page 18 of the same 10K:


Compliance with Section 16(A) of the Exchange Act

Our common stock was not registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009. Accordingly, our officers, directors and principal shareholders were not subject to the beneficial ownership reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during such year.

Why does the header say the common shares of RTGV are registered under section 12g.....yet the statement about compliance with 16(A) (ownership reporting) say the the shares AREN'T registered under section 12?

Could you check with your sources and get back to us regarding this? In the interests of providing full transparency to the shareholders here?