Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:49:02 PM
I had always considered BEDA a non-reporting company (as you are indicating) but was corrected by investors here based on the registration statement of the company.
The reason BEDA was on Reg SHO several months back was because it was being evaluated as a reporting company (Section 12 Registration; 0.5% of Shares Outstanding in an FTD) and not as a non-reporting company ($50,000 in aggregate FTD). The error by regulators in their calculation was that the shares issued being used to determin threahold status was stale due to a lack of up to date filings.
The reason BEDA was on Reg SHO several months back was because it was being evaluated as a reporting company (Section 12 Registration; 0.5% of Shares Outstanding in an FTD) and not as a non-reporting company ($50,000 in aggregate FTD). The error by regulators in their calculation was that the shares issued being used to determin threahold status was stale due to a lack of up to date filings.
Recent ZICX News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/20/2026 03:34:33 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/17/2026 02:49:39 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/23/2025 01:05:48 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/23/2025 01:04:33 PM
- Form 10-12G/A - Registration of securities [Section 12(g)]: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/16/2025 04:46:14 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 03:40:16 PM
