Wick, You are the moderator, and I am sure you read the 8k. It specifically states that TGLN gets all of the securities of Sterling, therefore in essence getting all of the company. The share for share exchange basically means that all the assets and liabilities of Sterling are now TGLN and by control being turned over as a result of the transaction, Sterling is now TGLN. There is no TGLN. I don't know know why Sterling did the transaction, but I do know that the deal does make sense. An actively traded shell with large volume and shareholders and more importantly aa active registration statement (SB-2) makes TGLN with more as a shell than the business itself. It can take years and hundreds of thousands of dollars to create volume and liquidity in a security. Even longer to create a market maker list as extensive as TGLN. The only thing fishy is why the posters on this board are doing so much talking about things and not being as accurate or straight forward. I am not a promoter or a basher. I am a keep it real kind of guy. I hope to follow the progress here, and hope the posters here are able to make a judgement between facts and pure fiction. More importantly not bash those that have a middle of the road, wait and see attitude. It's Friday and we all need a glass of wine and a weekend to celebrate the end of an era and hope for some real change going forward. Maybe this POS will move to .005 or .01. Who knows... Depends on what side of the trade you may be I assume.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
