Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,580.06
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
29,522.00
(
0.33%
)
Dow Jones
51,032.46
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
91.36
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
73,606.51
(
0.33%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 216439
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

spec_trader

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 14
Posts 1947
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/06/2009

spec_trader

Re: jamon1 post# 105128

Tuesday, 03/23/2010 6:13:53 PM

Tuesday, March 23, 2010 6:13:53 PM

Post# of 216439
There is more than 2 answers.
How about the answer Dr Lee gives saying he was getting ripped off and wants nothing to do with xmdc?

Isn't it odd to anyone that XMDC is nothing more than an unsuccesful marketing shell and Dr Lee is supposed to have a $27M revolutionary medical device, but with the deal that XMDC has stated, Lee gets common shares, a fraction of the common shares and XMDC gets the bulk of the value?

How does that make sense to anyone.

Seems backwards to me..
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent MCIC News
More MCIC News