SheldonLevine,
I had no idea what you were apologising for but I've found it by name searching, and all I can say is, as the resident punching bag, that was nuttin', and I did not take particular offense.
Moving on ...
I knew when I was writing the recent post in reference that I was shortcutting MSCAPI versus an actual end-user application, but what you have said seems to be in agreement with the notion that the adapter-module so-to-speak is just below MSCAPI (i.e. the CSP).
So, how significant is it that NTRU has adapted the bottom end of their TSS to accomadate any current compliant TPM and how signifcant is it that Wave has developed a CSP that apparently can accomadate any TSS? Is this something that is a mountain or a molehill with respect to market value and durability of IP?
Regards,
Dig Space.
The above content is my opinion.