That valuation is one groups opinion but there is NO sign the participants who buy and sell MDVX stock feel that that report has any real validity as demonstrated by widening of the gap between the company's market cap and the value stated in that report not a narrowing of it?
So just because someone, even supposed experts states it is worth something doesn't make it so. While valuations are certainly not an exact science there today remains a difference of 800% between the 2 valuation methods which is a rather large discrepancy.
For me the question on the table is are there going to be catalyst(s) to the stock price that changes the direction of the wideing valuation differential?