Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
6,611.83
(
0.44%
)
US TECH 100
23,555.60
(
0.07%
)
Dow Jones
46,669.88
(
0.36%
)
Brent Oil
105.55
(
-1.42%
)
Bitcoin
69,114.62
(
0.37%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 359151
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

stockhound101

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 12
Posts 2637
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2004

stockhound101

Re: janice shell post# 117965

Saturday, 11/06/2004 9:54:16 PM

Saturday, November 06, 2004 9:54:16 PM

Post# of 359151
Janice, I'm beginning to find out a lot is possible when it comes to the pinks. If none of the MM's are quoting the stock as of yet then IMO they would not be breaking 15c 2-11 rule.
I'm just saying that they all could have applied for the right to trade USCA in hopes that an MM that is sided with any possible short would controll the trading. That is if what you say is true that only one MM will be allowed to handle the stock for 30 days.

there is no "objective truth"--only patterns of probability. "Matter" is seen as an illusion of the senses.
_____________________________________________________

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Where Real Traders Talk Markets

Join thousands of traders sharing insights, catalysts, and charts.

Join Today