InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 759
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: ed_ferrari post# 279165

Thursday, 12/10/2009 1:38:28 PM

Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:38:28 PM

Post# of 432730
Ed, why are you here?

I've chided others for ignoring any negatives and constantly trying to pump any situation. You are the opposite end of the spectrum. You look for anything you can say to denegrate, whether the comment is relevant or not.

Yes, your statement is technically correct, although you acknowledge that tangible book value doesn't matter. Obviously when one says "all indicators", they are going to be wrong, because there are many indicators that are inappropriate for a particular company and some that are so narrow that they are only should be used in conjunction with many other indicators.

So what is the point of your post? The point the poster was making is that IDCC is undervalued, based on funamentals and reasonable expectations for future revenues. If you disagree, go ahead and make your case. But to jump on an innocuous overstatement and use it as an opportunity to throw a meaningless method of valuation that is a ridiculous $2 a share shows that you have little interest in helping folks here understand IDCC. You seem to just like to run by, throw a stink bomb, and then run away and watch everyone fanning away your smell. Please find the maturity to just walk away. You won't add anything of value, even though you have the ability, so just leave us in peace. Please.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News