InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,626.02
(
0.54%
)
US TECH 100
18,986.40
(
0.30%
)
Dow Jones
41,393.78
(
0.72%
)
Brent Oil
71.83
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,199.01
(
0.32%
)
Post# of 253124
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

DewDiligence

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 839
Posts 120436
Boards Moderated 18
Alias Born 09/05/2002

DewDiligence

Member Level

Re: rstor1 post# 4269

Thursday, 10/21/2004 7:08:48 PM

Thursday, October 21, 2004 7:08:48 PM

Post# of 253124
That makes two strikes on RGEN:

By perusing the RGEN board on Yahoo, one can see that a number of investors were hoodwinked into thinking that RGEN and BMY have some kind of collaboration to develop CTLA4. Rereading today’s RGEN PR (#msg-4348920), I surmise that this misconception is by the company’s design rather than by accident.

Was RGEN’s PR unlawful? No. Was it disingenuous? Yes.

This is the second time I’ve encountered questionable behavior by RGEN. The first time was the company’s leaking (through either negligence or malfeasance) of material information about the Secretin trial in autism (#msg-2059119).

Strike two!. One more strike and they’re out, cheap valuation or not.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up