News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257302
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122817
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: dewophile post# 85784

Thursday, 11/05/2009 8:54:29 PM

Thursday, November 05, 2009 8:54:29 PM

Post# of 257302
MNTA: Confirmed that only a fully substitutable “A/B rated” product counts as a competing Lovenox generic in the contractual terms of the NVS-MNTA partnership. Thus, in the context of the probability table in #msg-41414776 and the valuation discussion in #msg-42166244, approval of a non-substitutable Lovenox-like product from Teva and Amphastar is tantamount to an FDA rejection of the ANDA’s from those companies.

The probability of the above outcome—and whether the outcome is even possible—is, of course, debatable. The salient point is that whatever probability a given investor ascribes to the above outcome should be treated as incremental to the probability of the “single generic” case that is the most favorable case for MNTA.


“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today